We are collecting questions at screenings and through the WIKI. Please post your questions!
Q: What inspired you to make this film?
A: I wanted to explore the impact of water politics on women’s lives. With a pre-production grant from Paul Robeson, I traveled to Africa, Latin America, Europe, and North America exploring water stories. I even spent a week at Suez, the big transnational water corporation in France. My explorations ended when I visited Highland Park and discovered that residents of one of the poorest cities in America had these outrageous water bills. Having grown up in Baltimore, Maryland, I felt like this could easily be my home city. That realization forced me to narrow my focus and probe deeper. I was drawn to the incredibly strong women in this community who were approaching the crisis from very different positions. (I should mention that I am working on a “water and women” channel through blip TV to present all the footage I gathered in pre-production.)
Q: Throughout the film, it was never entirely clear to me why water prices in Highland Park were so much more expensive than average water prices in the rest of the country. Were residents paying for the city’s past missteps and debt?
A: Clarifying this point was a huge challenge in making the film because the answer is not simple. The rate increases exacerbated many other problems in an old water system (leaks, inconsistent billing practices, estimated bills, etc.). So if you had been receiving an estimated bill and paying it on time for several years and then a meter reading was done indicating a leak in the system, you might get a huge bill. In fact, the rate increases were not too far off from other rate increases around the country—it’s a trend. That said, the rate increases were especially significant for Highland Park—in Highland Park, water rates come out to 4.5 percent of a monthly income where as in Lansing, the capitol, they are only .8 percent of a monthly income.
Q: What has happened to Highland Park’s water privatization problem since the making of this film? Has anything changed now that a new consultant has been hired?
A: The water plant has not been privatized, but the workers are really struggling with an inadequate amount of staff and funding. Losing Gloria was a tragedy for the water plant because she took care of that plant as if it were her own. Residents are still trying to get their water bills off of their property tax statements and Detroit has just implemented the same measure …
Q: What was the biggest challenge in making this film?
A: The challenges were many. The situation was complex and trying to do it justice was a challenge. Also, I had very, very little funding to make the film so it took a long time and a lot of favors. The positive side of this is that so many people got involved and helped out and I am incredibly grateful for that.
Q: Who has inspired or informed your documentary filmmaking? Are there particular challenges you’ve encountered as a woman making doc films?
A: Kim Longimotto is an inspiration. In her work, you feel the intimacy of the camera and her respect for everyone she brings into the frame. And she finds the most amazing female protagonists. Challenges as a woman in making films …. for every challenge there is also the advantage—mine are editing, and economics!
Q. The residents are fighting for water as a basic human right
which it certainly is -- but it's also a precious resource. The film
points out that in five years, water will be as valuable as gold. But if it's
in short supply, shouldn't it be priced accordingly? Just as the argument
for pricing gasoline high to keep its use in check?
A: This is a compelling argument and one that is used by the corporations
interested in investing in water. We do want individuals to conserve
water but making it a valuable commodity is not the only way to do this or
necesarily the best way. Within this logic people with a lot of money
can continue to waste water while those living on lower incomes might be
outpriced of a resource that is essential to life. The market logic does
not work for water in the way it has for other resources like oil. You can
chose to drive a car or not but you really can not chose to go without water.
That said, running a water plant costs money and our public water systems need
to be maintained so we must find a way to invest in these systems that is
sustainable and inclusive. Groups like Food and Water Watch based in D.C.
are pressuring our government to invest in our water systems, which is a
way to acknowledge costs while ensuring everyone has the right to water.
Q. In conducting your interviews for the film, you were so balanced, I
had a hard time at first figuring out which side you were on: The (overpaid)
officials trying to resolve Highland Park's problems, or the citizens
who were fighting for their right for affordable water. You obviously
filmed this over time, as the story developed. Did your allegiances vacillate
during the course of filming?
A: My perspective did change again and again as I learned more information
and spent time in this community. What never changed for me was a commitment
to respect everyone who had agreed to share their perspective with me and to
try to present the problems playing out in this community as structural
and not simply individual.
Q: What was your impression of the emergency financial manager/consultant who is brought in?
A: Ramona Pearson is a dynamic and competent woman in a very complicated situation. In addition to working as the emergency financial manager, she continued to work as a corporate accountant. So she really had her hands full, which is why she hired a consulting team to help out. What I witnessed over time was an increasing communication gap between her team, the residents, and the workers.
Q. In the end, the high-paid officials are booted out, but what is the
solution to proper water management? How can the community bring more
revenue in /pay for its water treatment?
A: The answer to solving Highland Parks water and city crisis is complex and
is a situation plaguing other cities in Michigan and internationally who are
facing outdated water systems and a lack of resources to maintain them.
One message of the film is that we need to involve residents in finding
solutions to these challenges. The solution requires community
involvement financial investment (local and national), accountability and ongoing
communication between government officials and residents. A part of the
solution presented by the citizen group in Highland Park is a Water
Affordability Plan which ensures that everyone pays for water but that
noone is outpriced.
Q. Throughout the film we see water flowing freely from water spigots,
sprinklers, fire hydrants, car washes. How can we make water available
but teach conservation at the same time?
A: This is precisely the challenge we must explore together - no solution to
the global water crisis will work unless it combines conservation and
justice. And while we may need to establish regulations around water use,
if the regulations come from citizens themselves with explanations and open
discussion they are more likely to be respected.
Q: What was the end result of those high water bills? Were people still expected to pay them after the Emergency Financial Manager left?
A: The major problem residents are facing is trying to get their bills off of their property taxes.
Q: Who replaced the emergency mangers and what is happening there now?
A: Governor Grandholm replaced Ramona Pearson with another Emergency Manager whose name is Arthur Blackwell. Updates on the situation can be found at hpfolks.com, http://michigancitizen.com or The Legacy (a local paper).
Q: Where else is this happening? (high water rates, privatization)
A: There is a great site which is mapping the bottled water industry:
Q: What happened to the Water Affordability Plan? Could this be a model for other places?
A:It has already become a model for Detroit - read up on the latest on the plan: http://www.mwro.org/